Just had to share this email we received . . .

rifleToday I opened my front door wide open and set my Winchester Model 94 right in the doorway.   I placed 6 cartridges beside it, and noticing that it had no legs, set it on my mom’s old wheelchair to help it get around.  I then left it alone and went about my business.   While I was gone, the mailman delivered my mail, the neighbor boy across the street mowed the yard, a girl walked her dog down the street, and quite a few cars stopped at the stop sign right in front of our house.

After a couple of hours, I checked on the gun.   It was still setting there in the wheelchair, right where I had left it.   It hadn’t rolled itself outside.   It certainly hadn’t killed anyone, even with the numerous opportunities it had been presented to do so.   In fact, it hadn’t even loaded itself.   Well you can imagine my surprise, with all the media hype about how dangerous guns are and how they kill people.

Either the media is wrong, and it’s the misuse of guns by PEOPLE that kills people, or I’m in possession of the laziest gun in the world.

Alright, well I’m off to check on my spoons.  I hear they’re making people fat.

spoon

Hot Air Balloon

balloonA woman in a hot air balloon realized she was lost.

She lowered her altitude and spotted a man in a boat below.

She shouted to him,

Excuse me, can you help me? I promised a friend I would meet him an hour ago,

But I don’t know where I am.”

The man consulted his portable GPS and replied, “You’re in a hot air balloon,

Approximately 30 feet above ground elevation of 2,346 feet above sea level.

You are at 31 degrees, 14.97 minutes north latitude and 100 degrees,

49.09 minutes west longitude.

She rolled her eyes and said, “You must be a Republican.

“I am,” replied the man. “How did you know?”

“Well,” answered the balloonist, “everything you told me is technically correct.  But I have no idea what to do with your information, and I’m still lost.

Frankly, you’ve not been much help to me.”

The man smiled and responded, “You must be an Obama-Democrat.”  “I am,” replied the balloonist. “How did you know?”  “Well,” said the man, “you don’t know where you are — or where you are going.  You’ve risen to where you are, due to a large quantity of hot air.

You made a promise you have no idea how to keep, and you expect me to solve your problem.  You’re in exactly the same position you were in before we met, but somehow, now it’s my fault”

 

 

Is God a Democrat or Republican?

Editor’s Note: Pastor Roger Barrier’s “Ask Roger” column regularly appears at Preach It, Teach It. Every week at Crosswalk, Dr. Barrier puts nearly 40 years of experience in the pastorate to work answering questions of doctrine or practice for laypeople, or giving advice on church leadership issues. Email him your questions at roger@preachitteachit.org.

Dear Reader,

I receive a number of letters regarding Christians and politics. I hope my answers to several of them are helpful.

First, Is God a Republican or a Democrat?

Hi Pastor Barrier,

Many of my Christian friends are convinced that God is a Republican. They think that the liberal leanings of the Democrats are contrary to the teachings of the Bible and that we should use the political system to ensure that God’s teachings are the law of the land. What do you think?

Sincerely, G

Dear G,

Is God a Conservative Republican? No. Is He a Liberal Democrat? Certainly not. Is God a third party Libertarian? I think not.

Every society struggles with the conflict of liberals versus conservatives. These two political viewpoints seem to be built into the very essence of human nature.

I love what Winston Churchill said about this issue, “If you are not a liberal when you are young then you have no heart. If you are not a conservative when you are old then you have no brains.”

Of course, many others despise the essential values of both.

Israeli politics of the first century closely match what we see in America today:

The Pharisees (Republicans) were the religious and the more fiscal conservative party. They were deeply entrenched in money making and profiteering as evidenced from their business adventures in the Temple. They were for big business—especially when it lined their pockets. They were not particularly known as the party which championed the “down and outs” of society.

The Sadducees (Democrats) tended to be the upper social and economic echelon of Judean society. They were viewed as the more liberal party who were against big business and for more governmental involvement in public affairs. While they were often viewed as the less religious party, they embodied more humanistic leanings in contrast to religious ones. Their “big tent” included the “sinners and prostitutes”.

The Essenes (minor-third parties like the Libertine, Green Parties and Independents) were a party of desert dwelling separatists who had their own personal agendas and who seldom agreed with anyone.

Do you see the parallels with today? In broad sweeping terms the Republican Party looks a lot like the Pharisees and the Democrats look a lot like the Sadducees.

Of course, God is not a member of any party. As a Christian I am not so concerned with whether I am on the Republican or Democratic side. I am really concerned with whether or not I am on God’s side.

In Joshua 5:13-15  as he moved through the battle lines near Jericho, Joshua encountered a mighty soldier with a drawn sword. Joshua asked whether the soldier was on the side of Israel or on the side of Israel’s enemies. The soldier responded, “Neither. I am on the Lord’s side, on whose side are you?” Joshua fell on face and worshipped. May we never forget the God who transcends all human politics.

http://www.crosswalk.com/church/pastors-or-leadership/ask-roger/is-god-a-democrat-or-republican.html

Raw Milk

As many may now, Irene has a very strong opinion on raw milk. Both Mark and Irene grew up on raw milk and fed Aaron and Jared raw milk until 2001 when attending a conference and learned that the same symptoms of a cow with johnes disease is the symptoms of a person with crones disease. If we don’t feed a calf mother’s milk for fear the animal could have johnes disease, why would we feed it to our family; unless we know the herd is a closed herd tested free of johnes? That being said, we recently received this email from our retired vet . . . .

CDC: Most dairy-related disease outbreaks linked to raw milk

CDC: Most dairy-related disease outbreaks linked to raw milk
A recently released CDC study showed that raw milk product disease outbreaks led to severe illness.
The rate of outbreaks caused by unpasteurized milk and products made from raw milk was 150 times greater than outbreaks linked to pasteurized milk, according to a study by the U.S. government’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The 13-year review by CDC also reveals that the states where the sale of raw milk was legal had more than twice the rate of outbreaks as states where it was illegal.
The study was published last week in the CDC journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases. It reviewed dairy-produce-related disease outbreaks from 1993 to 2006 in all 50 states. Authors compared the amount of milk produced in the U.S. over the study period (about 2.7 trillion pounds) to the amount CDC estimates was likely consumed raw (a mere 1 percent, or 27 billion pounds) to come up with the 150 times higher rate of outbreaks caused by raw milk and products made with it, such as cheese and yogurt.
The study covered 121 dairy—related disease outbreaks, which caused 4,413 illnesses, 239 hospitalizations and three deaths. In 60 percent of the outbreaks (i.e. 73 outbreaks) state health officials determined raw milk products were the cause. Nearly all of the hospitalizations (200 of the 239) were from the raw milk outbreaks.
“Reported outbreaks represent the tip of the iceberg. For every outbreak and every illness reported, many others occur, and most illnesses are not part of recognized outbreaks,” the agency points out.
Thirteen percent of patients in raw milk outbreaks were hospitalized compared to just 1 percent in pasteurized milk outbreaks. This may be because raw milk outbreaks were all caused by bacteria, such as E. coli O157, which tend to produce more severe illnesses, study authors say. Pasteurized milk and cheese outbreaks were often caused by relatively mild infections like norovirus and Staphylococcus aureus.
CDC reports these dairy-related outbreaks occurred in 30 states, and 75 percent of the raw milk outbreaks (i.e. 55 outbreaks) occurred in the 21 states where it was legal to sell raw milk products at the time. The study also reported that seven states changed their laws during the study period.
“This study shows an association between state laws and the number of outbreaks and illnesses from raw milk products,” highlights Robert Tauxe, a medical doctor and deputy director of CDC’s Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases (DFWED). “Restricting the sale of raw milk products is likely to reduce the number of outbreaks and can help keep people healthier.”
This study also found that the raw milk product outbreaks led to much more severe illness—and disproportionately affected people under age 20. In the raw milk outbreaks with known age breakdowns, 60 percent of patients were younger than 20, compared to 23 percent in outbreaks from pasteurized products. Children are more likely than adults to get seriously ill from the bacteria in raw milk, according to the CDC.
CDC health officials warn that consumers can’t tell if raw milk is really safe to drink, and that even under ideal conditions of cleanliness, collecting milk introduces some bacteria, which unless the milk is pasteurized, can multiply and grow.
CDC isn’t alone either in backing pasteurization over raw milk, so does the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Veterinary Medical Association.
“While some people think that raw milk has more health benefits than pasteurized milk, this study shows that raw milk has great risks—especially for children, who experience more severe illnesses if they get sick,” notes study co-author Barbara Mahon, also a medical doctor, and deputy chief of CDC’s DFWED Enteric Diseases Epidemiology Branch.
“Parents who have lived through the experience of watching their child fight for their life after drinking raw milk now say that it’s just not worth the risk,” she notes. The CDC has several videotapes online of those parents discussing what they’ve been through (www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/rawmilk/raw-milk-videos.html).
“Back to nature”—that’s what many urbanites are trying to do with the food they buy and eat. They are shopping “local” at farmers’ markets and/or direct from producers, opting for organic at the grocery store, participating in food cooperatives or CSAs. Some are even getting into gardening or backyard chickens. Many people are trying to eat foods that are minimally processed. While that’s all well and good—and potentially profitable from the producer’s perspective—CDC warns that milk and dairy products do indeed need minimal processing, i.e. pasteurization. Heating milk to 161 degrees for about 20 seconds is all it takes to kill disease-causing germs like Salmonella, E. coli O157, Campylobacter and others that can be found in raw milk.
Before pasteurization, raw milk was a common source of the bacteria that cause tuberculosis, diphtheria, severe streptococcal infections, typhoid fever, and other food-borne illnesses that killed many people each year, especially young children. CDC reports that numerous studies have shown that pasteurization does not significantly change the nutritional value of milk. While heat slightly affects a few of the vitamins found in milk—thiamine, vitamin B12, and vitamin C—milk is only a minor source of these vitamins in the overall diet anyway.
CDC health experts want people to “understand the risks of drinking raw milk,” especially because they may “be hearing claims about the supposed ‘benefits’ of raw milk.” However, the CDC says that while it’s possible to get food-borne illnesses from all kinds of food, “raw milk is one of the riskiest of all.” And “getting sick” can mean many days of diarrhea, stomach cramping and vomiting, or less commonly, it can mean kidney failure, paralysis, chronic disorders, even death. For example, a person can develop severe or even life-threatening diseases, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, which can cause paralysis, and hemolytic uremic syndrome, which can result in kidney failure and stroke.
“If you think that certain types of bacteria may be beneficial to your health consider getting them from foods that don’t involve such a high risk. For example, so-called probiotic bacteria are sometimes added to pasteurized fermented foods, such as yogurt and kefir,” say CDC health experts.
Here’s the laundry list of germs sometimes found in raw milk that can make people sick: Bacteria (Brucella, Campylobacter, Listeria, Mycobacterium bovis, Salmonella, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, Shigella, Yersinia); parasites (Giardia), and viruses (norovirus).
According to the CDC, the risk of getting sick from drinking raw milk is greater for infants and young children, the elderly, pregnant women, and people with weakened immune systems, such as those with cancer, an organ transplant, or HIV/AIDS. But it’s important to remember that healthy people of any age—including farmers who’ve hung onto the idea of drinking their own herd’s raw milk—can get very sick or even die if it’s contaminated with harmful germs.
Raw-milk fans argue that it has more enzymes and nutrients than pasteurized milk
While it’s true that pasteurization does inactivate some enzymes in milk, “the enzymes in raw animal milk are not thought to be important in human health,” CDC states. “Some nutrients are somewhat reduced in raw milk, but the United States diet generally has plenty of other sources of these nutrients. For example, vitamin C is reduced by pasteurization, but raw milk is not a major source of vitamin C.”
Many people believe that small, local farms are better sources of healthy food. Indeed, CDC points out that “there are many local, small farms that offer pasteurized organic milk and cheese products.”
Does drinking raw milk prevent or cure any diseases, such as asthma, allergies, heart disease, or cancer? No, says the CDC. There are no health benefits from drinking raw milk that can’t be obtained from drinking pasteurized milk, and pasteurization of milk “has never been found to be the cause of chronic diseases, allergies, or developmental or behavioral problems.”
Here in Wisconsin, Loganville dairy producer Vernon Hershberger is facing charges for supplying a so-called private buying club with raw milk. At Agri-View’s press deadline earlier this week, “food sovereignty” activists were planning on gathering in Baraboo this week to support Hershberger at a court hearing. Hershberger is charged with, among other things, operating a retail food establishment without a license. Hershberger repeatedly denies this, citing he provides milk only to paid members in a private buying club and thus isn’t subject to state food regulations. “There is more at stake here than just a farmer and his few customers,” says Hershberger, “this is about the fundamental right of farmers and consumers to engage in peaceful, private, mutually consenting agreements for food, without additional oversight.”
At a pre-court rally scheduled for 11 a.m. March 2, in front of the Sauk County Courthouse in Baraboo, food rights activists will read and distribute a “Declaration of Food Independence” that asserts inherent rights in food choice. A signing ceremony will be part of the rally that advocates expect the declaration will inspire a growing food sovereignty movement. Event information can be had at RawMilkFreedomRiders.com.